TL;DR
Get everyday essentials delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Radio Television of Vojvodina apologized on air for years of one-sided and uncritical coverage, saying it failed to ask important questions. The apology followed Serbia’s October 25 parliamentary election, which the source report says was won by the Student List movement; RTV 1 acting editor-in-chief Nenad Čačić resigned afterward.
Radio Television of Vojvodina (RTV) apologized on air for years of one-sided, uncritical reporting, acknowledging that it had failed to ask important questions or report information fully. Acting editor-in-chief of its main channel, Nenad Čačić, resigned after the apology, according to a report by Meduza citing Serbian outlets. The apology followed Serbia’s October 25 parliamentary election.
During a news broadcast, anchor Goran Eror introduced footage of people celebrating after the election and said it showed only some of what RTV had not shown viewers the night before. He then read an apology acknowledging that the broadcaster had not fulfilled its public role.
“Things went unsaid, a blind eye was turned, information was one-sided, reporting was uncritical, and the right questions were not asked — or no questions were asked at all,” Eror said. He added that RTV owed its viewers an apology. The statement did not provide specific examples of coverage or identify individual decisions behind the shortcomings.
Eror said some employees had fought to let journalists and editors work freely, but that “we did not win the battle in time.” He said they believed it was important to continue that fight. Čačić resigned after the broadcast; the source report does not state whether he explained his decision or who would replace him.
Public Trust After the Election
The apology is a public admission by a publicly funded broadcaster that its reporting had been one-sided and insufficiently critical over a period described as many years. That matters because audiences rely on public media to provide information and scrutiny across political disagreements, particularly during elections.
The timing gives the statement added political weight: it came after a parliamentary vote in which, according to the report, the Student List movement defeated the party associated with Aleksandar Vučić. But the apology itself does not establish that RTV’s coverage changed voters’ decisions, nor does the source provide evidence measuring the broadcaster’s effect on the result. Its significance for viewers will depend on whether the admission is followed by changes to editorial practice and accountability.
Popular right now
Vitamix Propel Series 750 Professional-Grade Blender, 4 Programs, Black
Samsung 48-Inch S90H OLED 4K Smart TV (2026)
Ninja CREAMi 7-in-1 Ice Cream Maker, NC301
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Election and Vučić’s Political Role
Serbia held an early parliamentary election on October 25. Former President Aleksandar Vučić, who had resigned from the presidency about a month earlier, ran in the election, hoping to become prime minister if he won. The report says his party lost to the Student List, a movement that grew out of protests that began in 2024. The source material does not provide vote totals or further details about the formation of a new government.
Meduza also points to a similar apology by Hungarian television channel M1 following a change of government in spring 2026. It reported that Viktor Orbán stepped down after 16 years in power and that the new government announced a reorganization of public broadcaster MTVA. The comparison is limited: it describes another public broadcaster’s response to political change, but does not establish that the circumstances or reforms in Hungary and Serbia are the same.
“For many years, the public broadcaster failed to fulfill its role. Things went unsaid, a blind eye was turned, information was one-sided, reporting was uncritical, and the right questions were not asked — or no questions were asked at all. And for that, we owe our viewers an apology.”
— Goran Eror, RTV anchor, reading the broadcaster’s statement
Scope of RTV’s Acknowledgment
The report does not specify which broadcasts, stories or editorial decisions the apology referred to, or how long the period of problematic coverage lasted beyond Eror’s description of “many years.” It also gives no details about whether RTV will review past reporting, change its newsroom procedures or publish further findings.
The circumstances of Čačić’s resignation are not explained, and it is not clear who will take over as acting editor-in-chief. The source report identifies the election outcome but does not provide certified results, vote shares or information about coalition negotiations. The longer-term impact of the apology on RTV’s independence and public trust remains unknown.
Editorial Changes and Leadership
The immediate next development is likely to be clarification from RTV about its newsroom leadership following Čačić’s resignation. The broadcaster has not, in the material available, announced a replacement or described a timetable for changes to its editorial practices.
Viewers and journalists will be watching for whether RTV follows its apology with specific steps, such as clearer editorial standards, safeguards for independent reporting or a review of past coverage. The source report does not say whether any such measures have been planned. Political developments after the election, including the formation of a government, are also still to be confirmed in the information provided.
Key Questions
What did Serbia’s public broadcaster apologize for?
Radio Television of Vojvodina apologized for years of coverage it described as one-sided and uncritical, and for failing to ask important questions or report information fully.
Who read the apology?
Anchor Goran Eror read the broadcaster’s statement during an RTV news broadcast after the October 25 parliamentary election.
Why did RTV’s acting editor-in-chief resign?
Nenad Čačić resigned after the apology, according to the source report. It does not give his reasons or say whether he commented publicly.
Who won Serbia’s October 25 election?
The source report says the Student List movement defeated Vučić’s party. It does not provide vote totals or certified results.
Has RTV announced reforms after apologizing?
No specific reforms are described in the source material. It remains unclear whether RTV will review past coverage or change its editorial procedures.
Source: meduza.io
