TL;DR
Get everyday essentials delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Senior U.S. and Russian officials have discussed whether an American investor could participate in the Nord Stream pipeline projects, Reuters reported, citing sources. No deal has been announced; the White House said U.S. authorities would have to approve one and that Nord Stream had not been discussed recently.
U.S. and Russian officials have discussed the possibility of bringing an American investor into the Nord Stream pipeline projects, Reuters reported October 8, citing people familiar with the talks. The discussions raise the prospect of Russian gas sales to Europe being revived through the pipelines, but no agreement has been announced, and any deal would require U.S. government approval.
The officials involved include Kirill Dmitriev, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s special representative for investment and economic cooperation and head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund, and Jared Kushner, U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law. Reuters reported that both are also involved in talks aimed at ending Russia’s war against Ukraine. Dmitriev and Kushner have met in Moscow and New York in recent weeks, though it is unclear how much they discussed Nord Stream at those meetings.
Sources told Reuters the pipeline question remains on the agenda, while another source said a deal was unlikely in the medium term. The White House said U.S. authorities would need to approve any such arrangement and that there had been no recent discussions about Nord Stream. These accounts describe preliminary contacts, not a confirmed U.S. policy decision or an agreed plan to restart gas flows.
Dmitriev supports resuming Russian gas sales to Germany. In September, he met representatives of the U.S. Department of Energy and Treasury Department to discuss potential U.S.-Russian energy initiatives, according to the report. Reuters also reported that Kushner views business cooperation as a factor in efforts to reach a peace agreement. The details of any proposed investment, ownership structure, or gas-sale arrangement have not been made public.
A Potential Shift in Europe’s Gas Supply
If the idea advanced, American investment in Nord Stream could put U.S. companies in a role in energy supplies to Europe and create a possible route for Russian gas to return to the German market after the war. That would be a consequential change from the arrangements that followed Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, when pipeline flows stopped and the projects came under European Union and U.S. sanctions.
The report does not establish that Washington wants to restore those flows. German and other European governments would also have a major stake in any decision: the pipelines serve a European market, and the source material says those countries are preparing for Russian hybrid attacks and a possible invasion. Their opposition could complicate any attempt to revive Nord Stream, even if Russian and American participants reached a commercial understanding.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Nord Stream After the Invasion
Before Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, most of Germany’s gas came from Russia through Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2, according to the report. After the invasion began, gas flows stopped and the pipelines became subject to EU and U.S. sanctions. Germany is Europe’s largest energy consumer, making the future of Russian gas supplies there a significant commercial and political issue.
The reported contacts also overlap with wider U.S.-Russia discussions related to ending the war. Dmitriev and Kushner are involved in those talks, but the available reporting does not establish that Nord Stream is part of a formal peace proposal or that discussions on the pipeline have produced a negotiating framework. The September meetings between Dmitriev and U.S. energy and Treasury officials show that energy initiatives have been discussed, but do not confirm support for restarting the pipelines.
“The topic remains on the agenda.”
— A source cited by Reuters
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Approval and European Opposition
No proposed deal, investor, timetable, or operating plan has been publicly identified in the reporting. It is also unclear how extensively Dmitriev and Kushner discussed the pipelines in their recent meetings, how interested the U.S. government is in a revival of Russian gas exports, or what conditions officials might attach to any investment.
The status of sanctions and the positions of Germany and other European governments would matter to any effort to restart the projects. The source material anticipates opposition from European countries but does not report formal decisions by them on a specific proposal. The White House’s statement that there had been no recent Nord Stream discussions also leaves unclear how active the issue is within the U.S. administration.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Watch for Formal Proposals
The next meaningful developments would be confirmation of a specific investment proposal, clarification of the U.S. government’s position, and any response from Germany and other European governments. Any arrangement would need to address the required U.S. approvals and the sanctions affecting the pipelines. For now, the reported discussions remain preliminary, and the source report provides no date for a decision or restart of gas deliveries.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
Have the United States and Russia agreed to restart Nord Stream?
No. Reuters sources reported discussions about possible American investment, but no agreement or restart plan has been announced.
Who took part in the reported discussions?
The reported participants include Kirill Dmitriev, a senior Russian investment official, and Jared Kushner, U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law. Both are also involved in talks aimed at ending the war between Russia and Ukraine.
Would a deal automatically allow gas to flow to Europe?
No. The report says U.S. authorities would have to approve any deal. It does not describe an agreed operating plan, and the pipelines are subject to EU and U.S. sanctions.
How likely is a deal in the near term?
One source cited by Reuters said the sides were unlikely to reach a deal in the medium term. The report gives no timetable and no formal proposal.
What remains unknown about the proposal?
The identity of any investor, the proposed ownership structure, the level of U.S. government support, and the positions of Germany and other European governments are not established in the reporting.
Source: rss
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
